Publications

What is a Publication?
3 Publications visible to you, out of a total of 3

Abstract

Not specified

Authors: Leonard Schmiester, Yannik Schälte, Frank T. Bergmann, Tacio Camba, Erika Dudkin, Janine Egert, Fabian Fröhlich, Lara Fuhrmann, Adrian L. Hauber, Svenja Kemmer, Polina Lakrisenko, Carolin Loos, Simon Merkt, Wolfgang Müller, Dilan Pathirana, Elba Raimúndez, Lukas Refisch, Marcus Rosenblatt, Paul L. Stapor, Philipp Städter, Dantong Wang, Franz-Georg Wieland, Julio R. Banga, Jens Timmer, Alejandro F. Villaverde, Sven Sahle, Clemens Kreutz, Jan Hasenauer, Daniel Weindl

Date Published: 26th Jan 2021

Publication Type: Journal

Abstract (Expand)

When non-linear models are fitted to experimental data, parameter estimates can be poorly constrained albeit being identifiable in principle. This means that along certain paths in parameter space, the log-likelihood does not exceed a given statistical threshold but remains bounded. This situation, denoted as practical non-identifiability, can be detected by Monte Carlo sampling or by systematic scanning using the profile likelihood method. In contrast, any method based on a Taylor expansion of the log-likelihood around the optimum, e.g., parameter uncertainty estimation by the Fisher Information Matrix, reveals no information about the boundedness at all. In this work, we present a geometric approach, approximating the original log-likelihood by geodesic coordinates of the model manifold. The Christoffel Symbols in the geodesic equation are fixed to those obtained from second order model sensitivities at the optimum. Based on three exemplary non-linear models we show that the information about the log-likelihood bounds and flat parameter directions can already be contained in this local information. Whereas the unbounded case represented by the Fisher Information Matrix is embedded in the geometric framework as vanishing Christoffel Symbols, non-vanishing constant Christoffel Symbols prove to define prototype non-linear models featuring boundedness and flat parameter directions of the log-likelihood. Finally, we investigate if those models could allow to approximate and replace computationally expensive objective functions originating from non-linear models by a surrogate objective function in parameter estimation problems.

Authors: Daniel Lill, Jens Timmer, Daniel Kaschek

Date Published: 3rd Jun 2019

Publication Type: Not specified

Abstract (Expand)

Modular Response Analysis (MRA) is a suite of methods that under certain assumptions permits the precise reconstruction of both the directions and strengths of connections between network modules from network responses to perturbations. Standard MRA assumes that modules are insulated, thereby neglecting the existence of inter-modular protein complexes. Such complexes sequester proteins from different modules and propagate perturbations to the protein abundance of a downstream module retroactively to an upstream module. MRA-based network reconstruction detects retroactive, sequestration-induced connections when an enzyme from one module is substantially sequestered by its substrate that belongs to a different module. Moreover, inferred networks may surprisingly depend on the choice of protein abundances that are experimentally perturbed, and also some inferred connections might be false. Here, we extend MRA by introducing a combined computational and experimental approach, which allows for a computational restoration of modular insulation, unmistakable network reconstruction and discrimination between solely regulatory and sequestration-induced connections for a range of signaling pathways. Although not universal, our approach extends MRA methods to signaling networks with retroactive interactions between modules arising from enzyme sequestration effects.

Authors: D. Lill, O. S. Rukhlenko, A. J. Mc Elwee, E. Kashdan, J. Timmer, B. N. Kholodenko

Date Published: 1st Jun 2019

Publication Type: Not specified

Powered by
(v.1.14.2)
Copyright © 2008 - 2023 The University of Manchester and HITS gGmbH